Difference between revisions of "Talk:Golden Acorn Awards"
m |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
3. I pretty much copied stuff straight from the GAA Awards threads. So go for it either way. | 3. I pretty much copied stuff straight from the GAA Awards threads. So go for it either way. | ||
| − | + | -Eddie | |
Latest revision as of 22:40, 5 March 2008
I have a question concerning the GAA pages' layout (more precisely it's standardization):
1. Should the "Other nominees" section be done as a list (like in the 2007 awards' page)? I believe it is more clear that way.
2. Should the links redirect to individual works, author's page on the Wiki, a section of it or somewhere entirely different?
3. Should the maintainers of a web page be mentioned when the page itself receives the award (like Best Website Content)?
I'm not sure. Basically, I was bored that night, had just remembered my RangerWiki login (I'd forgotten my password) and noticed that no one had done anything for the 2007 GAAs yet. So I worked on them until I literally fell asleep at my desk. (Which might also explain unstandardized layouts...)
1. Go for it, either way.
2. I was planning on having all the artwork categories link to the authors. But like I said, it was late. (And my hand started to cramp up.)
3. I pretty much copied stuff straight from the GAA Awards threads. So go for it either way.
-Eddie
